Congress should investigate U.S. funding of the Palestinian Authority
Reader comment on item: Emerson Exposes Radical Ties of State Department Outreach Partners

Submitted by Yael, Aug 2, 2008 09:09

According to the State Dept., the United States is "largest single state donor to the Palestinian Authority."

We have provided $562 million in total assistance in 2008, surpassing our pledged level of $555 million. This includes $264 million in project assistance through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the State Department's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL); $150 million in direct budget support - the largest single tranche for funds provided to the Palestinian Authority by a single donor country; and $148 million in contributions to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

The "international community" has contributed $920 million, of which the U.S. has paid 61% -- and that's only so far this year. There's also another BILLION dollars in signed "bilateral agreements" for development projects. What are the agreements? Where are they published?

As it was with Arafat, there seems to be no transparency whatsoever. What countries pledged how much and how much have they paid? And most important of all, WHERE DO THESE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS GO?

  • The appointed PA Prime Minister, Finance Minister & Foreign Minister, Salam Fayyad, said April 5th, 2008: "There is no solution for the troubles in Gaza, or for the rockets being fired from it ... All we can do is transfer funds to the Gaza Strip."

  • PA President Abu Mazen (Mahmoud Abbas) in Feb. this year stated that "HAMAS are our brothers and part of the Palestinian people."

  • According to Rachel Ehrenfeld and Alyssa Lappen, the PA announced on Jan. 15th, 2008 its intentions to give HAMAS "40 percent" of the international aid received as a result of the Paris donor conference. At an Arab summit in Damascus, Abu Mazen said the PA transfers 58 percent to HAMAS in Gaza.

The Palestinian Authority should be included in any Congressional investigation of the role the State Department plays in funding foreign terrorists!


Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

  • Submit a comment on this item
  • More Reader Comments

    Title By Date

    CAIR=Terrorist Operative [119 words]

    SFC MAC 

    Aug 19, 2008 08:41

    An unobscure comment [138 words]

    Brian T 

    Aug 16, 2008 21:09

    "Have some more money" [28 words]

     

    Aug 16, 2008 13:16

    My response to Corey Saylor [1021 words]

    Steven Emerson 

    Aug 13, 2008 15:24

    Request that you correct a serious factual error [691 words]

    Corey Saylor 

    Aug 13, 2008 15:23

    Listen to Steven! [75 words]

    Kurt 

    Aug 7, 2008 16:16

    State Dept.'s Outreach [131 words]

    A. Lopez 

    Aug 4, 2008 03:04

    ⇒ Congress should investigate U.S. funding of the Palestinian Authority [324 words]

    Yael 

    Aug 2, 2008 09:09

    Thank you [138 words]

    PRCS 

    Aug 2, 2008 01:28

    ISN'T THE STATE DEPT..... [28 words]

     

    Aug 1, 2008 20:49

    Does the State dept, FBI etc give a damn?! [80 words]

    number 6 

    Aug 1, 2008 17:12

    The stupidity of American bureaucrats [51 words]

    Muslims Against Sharia 

    Aug 1, 2008 14:40

    how does this happen? [62 words]

    Brent 

    Aug 1, 2008 12:05

      America Alone [57 words]

    Lisa 

    Aug 4, 2008 16:28

    Comment on Emerson Exposes Radical Ties of State Department Outreach Partners

    Mark my comment as a response to Congress should investigate U.S. funding of the Palestinian Authority by Yael

    Email me if someone replies to my comment

    Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

    Click here to see the top 25 recent comments.