ISNA conference
Reader comment on item: "Mainstream" Islamist Convention Features Hate Speech and Hezbollah Defense
Submitted by Toni, Jul 14, 2009 16:02
It is a shame that a conference was held and people sat there passively and were silent, that is a disgrace. The mere fact that Umar was allowed to speak and nobody disapproved of his language or virulent anti-semitic cries of indecency toward the Jews and others is an outrage.. where there anybody there who was knowledgeable about the inciteful communication that was allowed to exist at t his conference... and why was there a lack of response from anyone sitting in the audience? Giving the platform to a person with ideas of hatred and misconstrued information only bolsters this persons ability to want to reach out more and express his intolerant views... Why do we keep allowing these people to speak and if they speak, then where is the debate?
Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.
More Reader Comments
Title | By | Date |
Who else? |
JH |
|
They rewrite history |
Al Redwood |
|
Have We Lost Our Minds? |
diane |
|
anti-Semitic, homophobic rhetoric |
Ray Bell |
|
⇒ ISNA conference |
Toni |
|
Hmmm intersting but what if |
Rabia'a |
|
Umar Thinking Is Ignorant Filth |
gb |
|
isna |
austin |
|
Umar's Comments at the ISNA Conference |
Patrick Dunleavy |