the problem with this website.
Reader comment on item: Hizb Ut-Tahrir: Shariah Takes Precedence over U.S. Constitution

Submitted by matt jones, Jul 22, 2009 23:19

instead of actually worrying about actual terrorism, this site seems deticated towards the identification of any group even slightly associated with terrorist activities, even though many groups with radical objectives have housed terrorists in their midsts merely because of a common goal, achievied through differing means. many have radical and by society's standards odd beliefs and objectives, however terrorism is based on using terror to control the people rather than convince them of an ideal or point of view. if this type of speech amounts to terrorist activity or can be associated with it, than most speakers for religios groups can be deemed in the same light. people like Tony Alamo, who is head of a radical fundamentalist Christian group believies that all must follow him or go to hell. this is certaintly subject to qualify for terrorist activity if the actions and words of Hizb-ut-Tahir are subject to such criticism. the point is that while these groups are opposed to religious freedoms and believe in international control, does not mean that one can call them terrorists/ or liken them to such in a website that would appear to be deticated not to terrorism but terrorism centered on radical islam.

Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.