Inexcusable? Yes! Surprising? NO!
Reader comment on item: Special Travel Benefit for Saudis a "Slap in the Face"

Submitted by Debraraes, Mar 20, 2013 22:45

This is not the first time that the TSA was allowed to give special preference to 'others'. Islamist were responsible for the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the Fort Hood Murders etc.......

So what did the TSA do? They gave special exemptions to 'women' in Hajibs. And this was shown to be the case when CBS News was covering a 'protest' that just didn't happen. On the news (the video is no longer available) there were a group of Four "women" (or it could have been men) in Hajibs. They were fully covered from head to toe. All they had to do was to show their driver's licenses and they were waved through.

However on that same video all American citizens had to go through the TSA Gauntlet. And they took 'special care' of the elderly, the infirm, and of 'children.

And while the TSA continued to assault law abiding citizens, and their babies etc...... then Big Sis gave 'special exemptions' to all Mexican Nationals (legal or not).

So now Big Sis and Barack are giving exemptions to Saudis, while they are terrorizing three year old girls in wheel chairs ... and humiliating our soldiers and vets.

If anyone is surprised by this latest slap in our faces ...they have 'not' been paying attention. It's time to allow the sequester to defund the TSA. Let each city with airports fund the security their selves in the way they deem fit! (Of course 'that' Obama will never allow to happen).


Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

  • Submit a comment on this item
  • More Reader Comments

    Title By Date

    What type of human are you ! [135 words]

     

    Apr 9, 2014 20:15

    No Surprise Here! [50 words]

    Roland 

    Mar 27, 2013 09:20

    Money Talks [33 words]

    The Duke 

    Mar 22, 2013 20:17

    This article is designed to mislead! [137 words]

    Mar 22, 2013 08:24

      Legitimate Article [85 words]

     

    Mar 22, 2013 22:21

    nothing lawful about DHS [61 words]

    pystali 

    Mar 21, 2013 12:40

    DHS SAUDIA'S LOVE FEST [101 words]

    tim 

    Mar 21, 2013 11:17

    protect at ANY costs [103 words]

    Shawn 

    Mar 21, 2013 10:53

    When I first saw this I thought it was a joke! [53 words]

    Bill 

    Mar 21, 2013 06:45

    Only one reason for wanting this leniency.... [68 words]

    Gladys 

    Mar 21, 2013 00:24

    DHS - Saudis are clear -crippled Americans are not [53 words]

    AI 

    Mar 21, 2013 00:06

    ⇒ Inexcusable? Yes! Surprising? NO! [248 words]

    Debraraes 

    Mar 20, 2013 22:45

    Reciprocity? [114 words]

    Tim Abernathy 

    Mar 20, 2013 20:52

    fool me twice, shame on me [51 words]

    Eric L 

    Mar 20, 2013 19:37

    This CANNOT be happening! [98 words]

     

    Mar 20, 2013 18:00

    What is happening in the good ole USA [35 words]

     

    Mar 20, 2013 17:44

    NO NO NO [14 words]

     

    Mar 20, 2013 16:33

    OK close the door [19 words]

    John 

    Mar 20, 2013 14:45

    Outrageous Yes, But... [40 words]

    Dallas 

    Mar 20, 2013 14:29

    DHS [80 words]

    KIMBERLY ARNOLD 

    Mar 20, 2013 13:18

    Shocking! [185 words]

    Tabitha 

    Mar 20, 2013 10:59

      inviting terror? [88 words]

    Larry Peterson 

    Mar 22, 2013 18:53

    THIS IS NOT A GOOD IDEA [229 words]

     

    Mar 20, 2013 10:27

    Comment on Special Travel Benefit for Saudis a "Slap in the Face"

    Mark my comment as a response to Inexcusable? Yes! Surprising? NO! by Debraraes

    Email me if someone replies to my comment

    Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

    Click here to see the top 25 recent comments.