Why is Yaakov Lappin ignoring Bernard Lewis's views on MAD?
Reader comment on item: Why Israelis See Shi'ite Axis as a Greater Threat Than Syrian Jihadis
Submitted by Mladen Andrijasevic, Sep 14, 2013 10:20
I agree with the basic premise of this article that the Shi'ite axis is a greater threat to Israel than Syrian jihadis. However, Yaakov Lapin writes: "If Iran isn't stopped, Hizballah, and other terrorist semi-states like Hamas in Gaza, could try to attack Israel while enjoying protection from an Iranian nuclear umbrella."
The problem is that once Iran gets nuclear weapons Iran may, according to renowned scholars of Islam, proceed to use them undeterred. It is Iran, not Hizbollah and Hamas which presents the main threat. Why, just why, is Bernard Lewis's warning "for people with this mindset, M.A.D. is not a constraint; it is an inducement" being disregarded even by Yaakov Lappin?
Why are Bernard Lewis's views on MAD ignored?
http://www.madisdead.blogspot.co.il/2012/05/why-are-bernard-lewiss-views-on-mad.html
Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.
More Reader Comments
Title | By | Date |
Israel is myopic beyond Iran |
Tarek Fatah |
|
⇒ Why is Yaakov Lappin ignoring Bernard Lewis's views on MAD? |
Mladen Andrijasevic |
|
A Few Problems Contained in this Article |
FactsRule |
|
Lee Jay |
Charlie |
|
Don't like the implication of this piece. |
Steve Klein |
|
In other words, the Alawites and Christians can go to hell? |
Lee Jay Walker |