What's wrong with asking questions about 9-11? The narrative has too many holes
Reader comment on item: Princeton Professor Embraces 9/11 Conspiracy Movement

Submitted by Matt Cusumano, Sep 21, 2013 01:53

I find it unusual that the author felt he had to explain the following: " The 9/11 attacks have been thoroughly investigated. The hijackers were seen on video going through airport security lines. And West is correct in saying bin Ladenadmitted being responsible. A good compendium of articles and videos explaining why the buildings collapsed, and why the conspiracy theories are baseless, can be seen here."

If it's so self evident, why do you have to give us a quick refresher? Why do you feel you need to reiterate the "official" narrative? The answers provided by the government for 9-11 are totally unsatisfactory to anyone who even spends a few minutes investigating 9-11.

The official story is an ad-hoc facade, and a very thin explanation for events that really don't ad up. One must quiet one's mind, and force oneself to not ask the obvious in order to accept the official story.

It's totally natural to wonder, and ask what really happened for the simple reason that 2 buildings where hit by jet liners at the world trade center, yet three high rise buildings collapsed in free fall. When you see WTC 7 fall for no apparent reason, and you cannot find one mention of WTC in the 9-11 report, you have to conclude that a large portion of the truth has been left out.

Call me crazy for questioning, I know it's fashionable to humiliate anyone who doesn't tow the line, but I won't turn off my brain just because the defenders of the official narrative has nasty retorts to dispense to those with questions. It doesn't bother me.


Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

  • Submit a comment on this item
  • More Reader Comments

    Title By Date

    Been awhile - Todd Charske [7 words]

    Todd Charske 

    Aug 21, 2015 23:30

    Science not Conspiracies [55 words]

    umbrarchist 

    Jan 25, 2014 14:42

      Theory is what starts a good experiement [13 words]

    Science or technology - no theory 

    Aug 21, 2015 23:32

    Cornel West, worth talking with [28 words]

    ER 

    Sep 22, 2013 19:49

    ⇒ What's wrong with asking questions about 9-11? The narrative has too many holes [270 words]

    Matt Cusumano 

    Sep 21, 2013 01:53

    College Professors should be held accountable - thanks Todd Charske [31 words]

    Todd Charske 

    Sep 19, 2013 08:46

      College [9 words]

    Todd Charske 

    Nov 13, 2015 08:24

    whats the point of this story? [19 words]

    esther 

    Sep 16, 2013 19:02

    What's the point of this story? [106 words]

    Dan 

    Sep 15, 2013 18:02

    Comment on Princeton Professor Embraces 9/11 Conspiracy Movement

    Mark my comment as a response to What's wrong with asking questions about 9-11? The narrative has too many holes by Matt Cusumano

    Email me if someone replies to my comment

    Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

    Click here to see the top 25 recent comments.