What's wrong with asking questions about 9-11? The narrative has too many holes
Reader comment on item: Princeton Professor Embraces 9/11 Conspiracy Movement
Submitted by Matt Cusumano, Sep 21, 2013 01:53
I find it unusual that the author felt he had to explain the following: " The 9/11 attacks have been thoroughly investigated. The hijackers were seen on video going through airport security lines. And West is correct in saying bin Ladenadmitted being responsible. A good compendium of articles and videos explaining why the buildings collapsed, and why the conspiracy theories are baseless, can be seen here."
If it's so self evident, why do you have to give us a quick refresher? Why do you feel you need to reiterate the "official" narrative? The answers provided by the government for 9-11 are totally unsatisfactory to anyone who even spends a few minutes investigating 9-11.
The official story is an ad-hoc facade, and a very thin explanation for events that really don't ad up. One must quiet one's mind, and force oneself to not ask the obvious in order to accept the official story.
It's totally natural to wonder, and ask what really happened for the simple reason that 2 buildings where hit by jet liners at the world trade center, yet three high rise buildings collapsed in free fall. When you see WTC 7 fall for no apparent reason, and you cannot find one mention of WTC in the 9-11 report, you have to conclude that a large portion of the truth has been left out.
Call me crazy for questioning, I know it's fashionable to humiliate anyone who doesn't tow the line, but I won't turn off my brain just because the defenders of the official narrative has nasty retorts to dispense to those with questions. It doesn't bother me.
Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.
More Reader Comments
Title | By | Date |
Been awhile - Todd Charske |
Todd Charske |
|
Science not Conspiracies |
umbrarchist |
|
↔ Theory is what starts a good experiement |
Science or technology - no theory |
|
Cornel West, worth talking with |
ER |
|
⇒ What's wrong with asking questions about 9-11? The narrative has too many holes |
Matt Cusumano |
|
College Professors should be held accountable - thanks Todd Charske |
Todd Charske |
|
↔ College |
Todd Charske |
|
whats the point of this story? |
esther |
|
What's the point of this story? |
Dan |