Science not Conspiracies
Reader comment on item: Princeton Professor Embraces 9/11 Conspiracy Movement

Submitted by umbrarchist, Jan 25, 2014 14:42

No mention of "physics" or "science" in the article.

Whether or not airliners less than 200 tons with 30 tons of jet fuel could destroy skyscrapers 2,000 times their own mass should have been resolved in 2002.

After TWELVE YEARS the real issue is why people claiming to be "scientists" didn't settle this long ago.

Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

  • Submit a comment on this item

    • More Reader Comments

    Title By Date

    Been awhile - Todd Charske [7 words]

    Todd Charske 

    Aug 21, 2015 23:30

    ⇒ Science not Conspiracies [55 words]

    umbrarchist 

    Jan 25, 2014 14:42

    ↔  Theory is what starts a good experiement [13 words]

    Science or technology - no theory 

    Aug 21, 2015 23:32

    Cornel West, worth talking with [28 words]

    ER 

    Sep 22, 2013 19:49

    What's wrong with asking questions about 9-11? The narrative has too many holes [270 words]

    Matt Cusumano 

    Sep 21, 2013 01:53

    College Professors should be held accountable - thanks Todd Charske [31 words]

    Todd Charske 

    Sep 19, 2013 08:46

    ↔  College [9 words]

    Todd Charske 

    Nov 13, 2015 08:24

    whats the point of this story? [19 words]

    esther 

    Sep 16, 2013 19:02

    What's the point of this story? [106 words]

    Dan 

    Sep 15, 2013 18:02

    Comment on Princeton Professor Embraces 9/11 Conspiracy Movement

    Mark my comment as a response to Science not Conspiracies by umbrarchist

    Email me if someone replies to my comment

    Note: IPT will moderate reader comments. We reserve the right to edit or remove any comment we determine to be inappropriate. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that include swearing, name calling, or offensive language involving race, religion or ethnicity. All comments must include an email address for verification.

    Click here to see the top 25 recent comments.